Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Gruul Aggro | mogged | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769892 |
Gruul Aggro | mogged | 8-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765784 |
Gruul Aggro | mogged | 7-1 | None |
Temur Beanstalk | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
4 Color Legends , 5 Color Legends , Boros Burn , Goblins , Gruul Aggro , Gruul Beanstalk , Gruul Cauldron , Gruul Counters , Gruul Delirium , Gruul Dinosaurs
Karplusan Forest ranks #414 out of approximately 413 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).
Colorless average: 64.1%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Karplusan Forest is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 40.78 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.2%. Karplusan Forest has a win rate of 73.9%, making it 0.3% worse than other 0-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Flowstone Infusion | Instant | 5 | 100.0% | 5 |
Cunning Coyote | Creature — Coyote | 5 | 86.7% | 4 |
Heritage Reclamation | Instant | 16 | 81.0% | 9 |
Valgavoth's Onslaught | Sorcery | 6 | 80.2% | 3 |
Hearth Elemental | Creature — Elemental // Sorcery — Adventure | 12 | 76.6% | 5 |
Furnace Reins | Sorcery | 15 | 76.3% | 9 |
Cori-Steel Cutter | Artifact — Equipment | 22 | 75.5% | 10 |
Tender Wildguide | Creature — Possum Druid | 5 | 71.9% | 2 |
Hidetsugu's Second Rite | Instant | 7 | 67.8% | 2 |
Invasion of Tarkir | Battle — Siege | 23 | 66.8% | 5 |
Cards that perform better with Karplusan Forest than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Callous Sell-Sword | Creature — Human Soldier // Sorcery — Adventure | 2 | 6 | 91.7% | 76.7% | +15.0% |
Turn Inside Out | Instant | 1 | 7 | 90.3% | 76.4% | +13.9% |
Cacophony Scamp | Creature — Phyrexian Goblin Warrior | 1 | 5 | 88.5% | 76.1% | +12.4% |
Leyline of Resonance | Enchantment | 4 | 5 | 88.5% | 76.1% | +12.4% |
Case of the Crimson Pulse | Enchantment — Case | 3 | 5 | 82.8% | 73.8% | +9.0% |
Slickshot Show-Off | Creature — Bird Wizard | 2 | 7 | 84.2% | 76.7% | +7.5% |
Overprotect | Instant | 2 | 5 | 88.5% | 81.2% | +7.3% |
Magmatic Hellkite | Creature — Dragon | 4 | 6 | 89.5% | 82.8% | +6.7% |
Pyroclasm | Sorcery | 2 | 29 | 81.2% | 76.3% | +5.0% |
Heritage Reclamation | Instant | 2 | 16 | 80.0% | 75.2% | +4.8% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Gruul Aggro | 1975 | 94.8% | 47.9% |
Temur Otters | 298 | 88.7% | 42.3% |
Gruul Leyline | 165 | 85.9% | 56.0% |
Gruul Delirium | 153 | 99.3% | 39.1% |
Gruul Surprise | 24 | 92.3% | 36.7% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.